If you’ve become recently interested in a PEMF or infrared product for yourself, you probably have come across these two brands, and may now be looking to compare Healthy Wave Mat vs Bemer.
Comparing these two is a little like comparing apples to a hot apple pie, they’re both apples, but one’s been heated up and the other hasn’t.
This is like comparing Healthy Wave Mat to the Bemer because both of these devices provide PEMF therapy, but the Healthy Wave Mat also heats up to provide something called far infrared therapy (it also includes red light therapy, something the Bemer includes in a separate package now).
If you’re still curious about PEMF therapy, you could start on our PEMF mat benefits page to learn more before comparing these two PEMF mats.
Noticeable differences between Healthy Wave & Bemer are:
- Price Points
- Therapies Included
- Options offered within the therapies
- Returns & Warranties
- Overall Marketing Messages
Quick Links,
Table Of Contents
- Healthy Wave vs Bemer
- Quick Comparison
- Pros and Cons of Each
- PEMF Signal Differences
- Physical Differences
- Marketing Messages Compared
- PEMF Flexibility Compared
- Research Studies
- Circulation Benefits Compared
- Pain Benefits Compared
- PEMF Safety Compared
- On the Energy Spectrum
- Which will work Better for You?
- Warranty & Return Details Compared
- FAQ
On this page
- Healthy Wave vs Bemer
- Quick Comparison
- Pros and Cons of Each
- PEMF Signal Differences
- Physical Differences
- Marketing Messages Compared
- PEMF Flexibility Compared
- Research Studies
- Circulation Benefits Compared
- Pain Benefits Compared
- PEMF Safety Compared
- On the Energy Spectrum
- Which will work Better for You?
- Warranty & Return Details Compared
- FAQ
Quick Comparison – Healthy Wave vs Bemer
There are now multiple versions of the Bemer, but the main differences are simply what is included in the kit (while the PEMF stays the same), from the Basic-Set Evo including only the mat and controller, to the Premium-Set Evo including mat, bed mat, controller and 2 more spot applicators.
The Healthy Wave Mats have a large size/option selection variety, but here we will compare the Healthy Wave Multi-Wave Mat to the Bemer, as it’s the product most synonymous with the Bemer apart from the infrared therapy from amethyst crystals included in the Healthy Wave.
Healthy Wave Multi-Wave PEMF Mat
Price Range
PEMF Therapy
Waveform
- 2 Waveforms
- Sine & Square
Frequency
- 30 Settings
- 1 to 30 Hz
Intensity
- 10 Settings
- 0.3 up to 3 Gauss
Pulse Duration
- 3 Pulse Drop Off Rates
Additional
- Infrared therapy included (with negative ions)
- Red light therapy included
Bemer Mat
Price Range
PEMF Therapy
Waveform
- 1 Waveform
- Sinewave
Frequency
- 2 Settings
- 10 & 33 Hz
Intensity
- 0.35 Gauss & 1.5 Gauss Spot Applicator
Pulse Duration
- Not Adjustable
Additional
- Red light therapy applicator only included in separate Beauty pack
- Higher price sets include spot applicator
Pros and Cons of Healthy Wave and Bemer
Healthy Wave Multi-Wave
PEMF Pros & Cons
Bemer Mat
PEMF Pros & Cons
Bemer PEMF vs Healthy Wave PEMF – Understand the Signal Differences
The easiest way to understand the differences in the Bemer and Healthy Wave PEMF signals is to compare them visually.
Below are representations I drew up of a sine and square PEMF waveform and of the Bemer PEMF waveform, also called the “Bemer Signal”.
The sine wave and square wave used by the Healthy Wave mat are the most widely researched PEMF waveforms, according to the waveforms we recorded from the 335 PEMF studies in our research database.
You’ll see a bar chart of the number of studies that used each waveform in our database in the PEMF flexibility section below.
Two things that the visual representation above doesn’t provide us is the frequency and intensity of the PEMF waveform as it’s applied.
You’ll see below in both the PEMF flexibility and PEMF safety sections charts which I’ve indicated the intensity and frequency operating ranges of both the Bemer and the Healthy Wave.
In short, the Bemer mat has 2 frequencies, maximum 33Hz, the Healthy Wave has 30 frequencies, maximum 30 Hz, and the maximum intensity of the Bemer is 1.5 Gauss (only with the spot applicator) which is half the maximum intensity of the Healthy Wave at 3 Gauss.
Physical Differences Between Bemer and Healthy Wave
The main physical difference to note between the two products is that the Bemer mat is flexible, whereas, because of the combined construction of PEMF and amethyst crystals in the Healthy Wave Mats, they are heavier and not as flexible like the Bemer and should be used on a relatively firm, flat surface.
The use of crystals in the Healthy Wave does make the mat heavier but the trade off is to generate a deep infrared heat therapy with the added benefit of negative ions.
The amethyst, jade, and tourmaline crystals emit negative ions when heated which have a number of benefits, check our page on benefits of negative ions if you want to read more.
What are the Marketing Messages between Healthy Wave and Bemer?
Bemer’s primary marketing message is that their PEMF therapy includes a “physical” magnetic signal which is the best for microcirculation.
Healthy Wave Mat’s primary message, particularly with the Multi-Wave mat, is that their PEMF therapy allows you to use not just one, but numerous PEMF signals that PubMed research shows to be effective; in addition to providing effective infrared therapy and red light therapy.
I looked in depth at Bemer for circulation on my Bemer guide page in the Bemer circulation section and we will see a list of PEMF research studies which can be closely replicated by the Healthy Wave mat in the research studies section below.
I’ve also included a Bemer vs Healthy Wave for circulation section below.
PEMF Flexibility Compared Between the Two
What I mean by PEMF flexibility, is the ability to change the PEMF signal whether by the waveform, the frequency, intensity or the pulse drop off rate.
Probably the biggest takeaway from the PEMF therapy macro-analysis we did of 335 research studies was that there was no be all, end all, best PEMF therapy signal.
I go into detail on that on the macro-analysis page in the What is the Best PEMF Therapy section, but the overview you can get here looking at these charts as well.
As I mentioned above you’ll see the intensity and frequency range operations of the Healthy Wave Multi-Wave and Bemer signal in this section, on the two charts below, intensity on the left axis, frequency along the bottom axis.
What I did here was take a chart that I made for the What’s the Best PEMF section on our macro-analysis page, where I plotted green dots at the PEMF intensity and frequency of research studies that showed a positive result – and then overlaid the operating range of the Healthy Wave mat and the Bemer.
As you can see the Healthy Wave mat covers off a range of frequency and intensity highlighted in the green square, while the Bemer, because of its two frequencies, operates its signal within the range of the two blue circles indicated.
The striking part from these charts is the dramatically wide range of frequencies and intensities which found positive results in the PEMF research studies from our database.
Again, each green dot is showing us the PEMF intensity and frequency setting used in a PEMF research study that found a positive result – and as you can see these dots are ALL over the place.
That’s what I mean when I say there is no “one best PEMF therapy signal”, how can there be when the research is showing results all over the place like this.
What those charts don’t show above is what waveform was used, and as I mentioned above now I’ll show you the bar chart we made to show how many studies were using which different waveforms out of our database.
It’s easy to see above that the most commonly used waveform from our database was the sine wave, followed next by the square wave.
All this can be found in more detail on our macro-analysis of PEMF therapy page, and more about PEMF flexibility on our Best PEMF mats page as well.
Healthy Wave and Bemer Research Studies
In this section I’ll provide a list of research studies I found on the Bemer, as well as a list of PEMF research studies which can be closely replicated by the Healthy Wave mat.
I made the tables searchable so you can browse through them.
Disclaimer
Please note that Health Mat Review assumes no copyright over the following research studies, we’ve simply searched as thoroughly as possible through Pubmed for Bemer Therapy and PEMF therapy studies & provided a summarized data table here exclusively of studies involving the Bemer mat and PEMF therapy and provided search functionality for you. All copyright and IP belongs to the authors & their associates.
While building my Bemer mat review guide, I searched high and low to find as many research studies looking at the Bemer as I could to try and give us a better idea of how well it works and eventually I managed to find 30 altogether.
I pulled out some of the more interesting Bemer studies on pain, MS, and fibromyalgia and went through them on the Bemer guide page in the Does Bemer Therapy Really Work section which I recommend reading if that interests you, or check out the whole review page.
Once our PEMF database of 335 studies was built, I sorted through them and found a list which used PEMF configurations that can be closely replicated by the Healthy Wave Multi-Wave mat.
One other cool thing is the well known Nasa PEMF study, used a square waveform, at 10Hz, and 200 mGauss, and the Healthy Wave Multi-Wave mat can closely replicate it using its square wave, at 10Hz, and the 300 mGauss intensity setting.
The list of studies from our data base with PEMF that can be closely replicated by the Health Wave Multi-Wave mat is as follows and you can search through it using the search bar.
Next let’s consider Bemer and Healthy Wave for a couple common applications, circulation and pain.
Bemer vs Healthy Wave for Circulation
The Bemer marketing message is that it’s the best for microcirculation, and in my search to create the table of Bemer research studies shown above, I found 8 Bemer studies related to circulation.
Of those studies, 3 were performed by independent groups, and 5 were performed by the Microcirculation institute, a partner of the Bemer group located in Berlin (but now permanently closed as can be found in a Google maps search).
Of the 3 independently performed Bemer studies the results, quoting here, were:
- “no difference between the PEMF and control group” – Study 1
- “did not enhance.. (the) Cutaneous microcirculation” – Study 2
- “Increase in microcirculatory blood flow… allowed forming a concept for a randomized trial” – Study 3
- This study didn’t use a placebo group, but indicated results warrant further investigation with a real randomized control trial
Of the 5 partner studies performed by the Microcirculation institute, all 5 of them found positive impacts of Bemer on circulation.
These results appear to be mixed, even if we ignore any possibility of bias from the partnered institute.
In the Bemer Circulation – Vasomotion section of my Bemer guide you’ll find further details on all these studies as well as full quote excerpts.
As I discussed in that section I’m not trying to suggest that Bemer therapy doesn’t work for circulation, only that there doesn’t seem to be compelling evidence that it works significantly better than other PEMF signals.
When we look at the Healthy Wave Multi-Wave mat, the therapies which would likely do the most to contribute to improved circulation are the infrared therapy and the configurable PEMF signal.
Infrared therapy has a number of benefits, and actually I made an in depth page on the benefits of infrared mats, but specifically looking at circulation we can take examples from a couple research studies (of many).
- Effects of Far-Infrared Therapy on Foot Circulation Among Hemodialysis Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
- Quoting the study:
- “findings of significant improvements to objective and subjective measures of blood flow and neural function in the experimental group indicate that FIR therapy improves blood circulation to the feet”
- Quoting the study:
- Evaluating the Far-Infrared Radiation Bioeffects on Micro Vascular Dysfunction, Nervous System, and Plantar Pressure in Diabetes Mellitus
- Quoting the study:
- “These results indicated that the effects of far-infrared radiation would improve blood circulation and change the soft tissue properties in the diabetic foot.”
- Quoting the study:
These studies concerned themselves with whether infrared therapy could be beneficial in diabetic patient’s feet which suffer microcirculation and circulation issues.
As can be seen from the quotes taken from both the above studies, far infrared therapy was indeed found to make significant improvements to the circulation in the patient’s feet.
Anyone who has used an infrared mat will also know that it’s similar to being in an infrared sauna, your circulation ramps up substantially for the duration and for some time afterward as well.
When it comes to PEMF therapy for circulation, as we know from the Bemer studies, and many other studies on PEMF therapy, it can be beneficial.
Interestingly the PEMF in the following study can be closely replicated by the Healthy Wave Multi-Wave mat.
- Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on peripheral blood circulation in people with diabetes: A randomized controlled trial
- Quoting the study:
- “Results indicated that PEMFs produced significantly greater changes in blood flow velocity of the smallest observable vein than did sham PEMFs (both P < 0.05) in both types of subjects.”
- Quoting the study:
The PEMF used in the above study was a frequency of 12 Hz at 5 Gauss, the Multi-Wave mat can replicate 12 Hz, at a max of 3 Gauss, similar to the study but a little lower intensity.
However Healthy Wave’s new high intensity PEMF mat product produces an average maximum of 7 Gauss above the mat which is adjustable so you can actually effectively replicate that exact PEMF signal.
This next interesting study reported some quite significant results and can also be closely replicated by the Healthy Wave High intensity PEMF mat.
- Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy promotes healing and microcirculation of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: a pilot study
- Quoting the study:
- “The PEMF group demonstrated significant cumulative increase in cutaneous capillary blood velocity (by 28%) and 14% increase in capillary diameter.”
- Quoting the study:
Perhaps more surprising from that study, was that the wound healing observed in the PEMF versus non PEMF group was almost double the decrease in wound size in the active PEMF group.
Quite a stark result.
That study used a PEMF configuration of 12 Hz frequency and 12 Gauss intensity, which can be closely, not perfectly, replicated by the Healthy Wave high intensity PEMF mat as well.
The high intensity PEMF mat by Healthy Wave also includes infrared therapy, and using both the infrared and the configurable PEMF signals may provide a powerful circulation therapy when used in combination in either mat.
Bemer vs Healthy Wave for Pain
PEMF therapy and Bemer are also used commonly to help with pain management.
Indeed of the 30 Bemer studies I found a few of them looked at pain, low back pain, knee pain, myofascial pain and mostly they found improvement but typically noted further research should be performed.
On my Bemer guide page I have some of the more interesting studies excerpted with more detail in the Bemer therapy for Pain section, but looking at a couple of those Bemer studies briefly here:
- BEMER Therapy Combined with Physiotherapy in Patients with Musculoskeletal Diseases: A Randomised, Controlled Double Blind Follow-Up Pilot Study
- Quoting the study:
- “Our study suggests the possibility that BEMER therapy administered in combination with traditional physiotherapy procedures reduces chronic lower back pain in the short term and may be effective in the long-term treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of knee.”
- Quoting the study:
- Effect of osteopathic manipulative treatment and Bio-Electro-Magnetic Energy Regulation (BEMER) therapy on generalized musculoskeletal neck pain in adults
- Quoting the study:
- “Study arms that incorporated BEMER yielded improvements on the NDI, VAS, and SF-12, indicating benefits to BEMER regarding improved overall functionality in routine daily activities as well as a reduction in nonspecific neck pain.”
- Quoting the study:
Both of these studies indicated additional benefits of pain reduction when using Bemer therapy in conjunction with chiropractic therapy or physiotherapy.
As with circulation improvement the 2 therapies included with Healthy Wave mat which would yield the greatest effect in pain management would be the PEMF therapy and infrared therapy.
From my own experience I can’t really understate the difference that the infrared heat from my Healthy Wave mat made for my severe disc herniation in my L5-S1 disc (back and sciatic pain) which lasted for months.
I can really sympathize with anyone undergoing a similar situation, it’s incredibly life altering to be living in that amount of pain for so many months, even years if you include relapses in my case.
I wrote about my experience using my infrared mat and how and why it helped with my back pain on the page I wrote on infrared mat benefits if you want to read more.
Looking now at research studies instead of my own experience:
- Far infrared wavelength treatment for low back pain: Evaluation of a non-invasive device
- Quoting the study:
- “Use of site-specific FIR therapy over a four-week period in the workplace was associated with significant clinical improvements in pain and quality of life for office workers with previously refractory low back pain.”
- Quoting the study:
- Infrared therapy for chronic low back pain: A randomized, controlled trial
- Quoting the study:
- “The IR therapy unit used was demonstrated to be effective in reducing chronic low back pain, and no adverse effects were observed.”
- Quoting the study:
Pretty clear results from both these studies that infrared therapy just plain works, at least for low back pain.
The Healthy Wave mat works particularly well for this since you can lay with your back against the infrared heat of the mat.
I also have a smaller infrared pad from Healthy Wave which you can see in the my infrared mat section of the infrared benefits page, which works well for everywhere else, a leg, arm, or even just using it on the couch – it’s versatile since it’s flexible and can be wrapped around you.
Next, looking at some PEMF therapy studies for pain, we’ll look at a couple of interest which are within the operating range of the Healthy Wave Multi-Wave and Healthy Wave high intensity mats.
Often it is tricky to find the operating parameters of PEMF signals used in studies as the full study details may be behind a pay wall however I stumbled across the following PEMF therapy review article put together at Harvard medical school which listed PEMF configurations from a number of studies in a helpful table.
Where I’ve highlighted above the first study falls directly into the operating range of the Multi-Wave mat and the second two within close operating range of the high intensity Healthy Wave mat.
I then searched out those 3 studies which I’ve put here in the same order as found above:
- Magnetic pulse treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study – Pipitone & Scott 2001
- Quoting the study:
- “Although there were no significant differences between active and sham treatment groups in respect of any outcome measure after treatment, paired analysis of the follow-up observations on each patient showed significant improvements in the actively treated group in the WOMAC global score (p = 0.018), WOMAC pain score (p = 0.065), WOMAC disability score (p = 0.019) and EuroQol score (p = 0.001) at study end compared to baseline. In contrast, there were no improvements in any variable in the placebo-treated group.”
- Quoting the study:
- The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee and cervical spine. Report of randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trials – Trock et. al 1994
- Quoting the study:
- “Means of the treated group of patients with OA of the knee showed greater improvement from baseline values than the placebo group by the end of treatment and at the one month followup observation.”
- “The means of the treated patients with OA of the cervical spine showed greater improvement from baseline than the placebo group for most variables at the end of treatment and one month followup observations; these differences reached statistical significance at one or more observation points for pain, pain on motion, and tenderness.”
- Quoting the study:
- A double-blind trial of the clinical effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields in osteoarthritis – Trock et. al 1993
- Quoting the study:
- “The decreased pain and improved functional performance of treated patients suggests that this configuration of PEMF has potential as an effective method of improving symptoms in patients with OA. This method warrants further clinical investigation.”
- Quoting the study:
These studies all indicate an improvement from baseline with knee and neck pain, but note that more research is warranted – similar to the Bemer studies.
This is pretty much the case for every PEMF and Bemer study out there, because this type of therapy is relatively new and with basically unlimited potential PEMF parameters to choose from, I think it will be a number of years until the research community starts to really find any real consensus.
As we saw with circulation above, it seems like the combination of infrared therapy and PEMF therapy could provide a powerful combination in alleviating symptoms.
Just as a final note, if you are someone suffering from pain, you should always seek the advice of your own physician with any concern you have, everyone is different and you should never disregard professional medical advice based on something you read here.
For example, there are more malicious causes for back pain than my own was.
PEMF Safety Compared
The two factors I consider in the PEMF safety section on our Best PEMF mats page are whether the devices are FDA registered and where they land on the ICNIRP chart.
The ICNIRP, is the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, and offers guidelines on electromagnetic field exposure.
I dug through their literature and found a chart depicting what is safe electromagnetic exposure for public and occupational purposes, and then I charted the operating ranges of the Bemer and Healthy Wave onto this chart which is what I’m showing here below.
In short, both the Bemer and Healthy Wave Multi-Wave mats are operating fully within the safe range of electromagnetic exposure which I like to see.
As opposed to the chart further up the page which showed 2 dots for where the Bemer operated, this shows 4 and this is only because the chart further up the page is zoomed way out on the intensity scale, where as this chart is zoomed way in so to speak which allows you to see the difference in intensity of the mat and point applicators up close.
As with the chart further up the page, here we can again see the wide operating frequency and intensity range with the Multi-Wave mat, all within the safe range of electromagnetic exposure.
This is one nice aspect of both of these PEMF mats, safety wise you can’t go wrong with either of them.
Where are Healthy Wave and Bemer on the Energy Spectrum?
For some visual context, it may help us to see both the Healthy Wave and the Bemer on the electromagnetic energy spectrum as well.
We took this image from Nasa, and then customized it to display where the Healthy Wave and Bemer fall upon the range.
Looking at the chart you can see both Bemer and Healthy Wave are at the same spot, falling on the very low frequency end of the spectrum, much lower than its neighbor the radio waves.
This is where PEMF therapy lands along the spectrum and therefore we find the Bemer and the Healthy Wave both operating in this range as well.
Infrared you can see both the Healthy Wave and Biomat fall into this range, this is like the heat we feel from the sun’s light.
The Healthy Wave is also there on the infrared range because of the infrared heat therapy included in the mats.
Which will work better for you?
This is a question I asked myself when I bought my PEMF mat which I describe on our PEMF mat benefits page.
PEMF mats are expensive no matter which one you might buy and so it’s kind of a stressful decision to make because you don’t want to get stuck with one that doesn’t work for you.
This is just like the decision I’m working through right now with a pair of winter boots I need to buy and my long and narrow feet which don’t really fit many shoes well, good boots are expensive and if I make this decision wrong I wont be able to return them once wearing them around which really sucks.
On this aspect the Healthy Wave Multi-Wave mat is the clear less stressful choice because with a $2,495 USD price point, and a 90 day 100% back return policy, you can really buy and try it – unlike me with my winter boots scenario.
The Bemer in comparison starts at $4,590 USD and you only have 30 days to return it minus a 10% restocking fee.
Warranty and Return Details Compared
I’ve compiled the details of the warranty and return policies for both the Bemer and Healthy Wave Multi-Wave mat here for easy comparison.
As I mentioned in the pros and cons table at the top of the page, one thing to note is the importance of the controller warranty because it is the device most prone to failure in any PEMF device.
The nature of how the controller manages the PEMF signal by rapidly turning on and off transistors generates a bit of heat within the electronics.
You’ll actually notice your PEMF controller will get a little warm during operation, and it’s likely this warming and cooling each time and the constant operation of those transistors which result in the controllers being more prone to failure over time.
In this regard the Bemer has a 3 year warranty on the controller (and rest of mat) and the Healthy Wave has a 5 year warranty on the controller (but a 2.25 warranty on the rest of the mat).
Return Policy Details
|
|
|
Warranty Policy Details
|
|
|
FAQ
Is Bemer or Healthy Wave better for Pain?
The research shows that both Bemer and Healthy Wave’s PEMF can be beneficial to pain relief, however the Healthy Wave also includes infrared therapy which is also effective for pain relief and the combination of infrared and PEMF may perform better than PEMF alone.
Is Bemer or Healthy Wave better for Circulation?
The research shows that both Bemer and Healthy Wave’s PEMF can be beneficial to circulation, however the Healthy Wave also includes infrared therapy which is also effective for circulation enhancement and the combination of infrared and PEMF may perform better than PEMF alone.
What’s the difference between Healthy Wave and Bemer’s PEMF?
The primary difference between Bemer and Healthy Wave’s PEMF is the shape of the PEMF waveform, (which I provide a visual comparison on this page), and additionally there are differences to the intensity and frequency options.
Are Bemer and Healthy Wave safe to use?
Yes, Bemer and Healthy Wave are both operating in the safe range of the guideline chart for electromagnetic field exposure provided by the ICNIRP, International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, and are both cleared by the FDA for sale to the public.
Thank you for reading! I really hope this page helped answer your questions!
If it did, please share it with friends or family who may also be interested because it was a lot of work to put together and so hopefully it can help as many people as possible 🙂
Next page to check out is my recommended PEMF mat, the Healthy Wave Multi-Wave Mat!
Hi Greg
Does the healthy wave mat fold up into a suitcase for transporting on an aeroplane and how much does it weigh?
Thanks
Hey Sam,
good question.
First, all Healthy Wave mats come with a carrying bag, so, not a suitcase, but you could certainly fold the mat, put it in it’s zip up carrying bag, and put it into your suitcase.
The weight, (and how big of suitcase you would need) is going to depend on the size of the mat in question.
For example, the small Healthy Wave infrared PEMF mat I use on my couch, it folds up small enough that you could even take the bag as a carry on.
The larger, full size mats, would need to be put in a suitcase as a checked bag.
For certain I can tell you that any full size or Pro size Healthy Wave mat will fold up and fit into a regular full size checked luggage bag.
On any Healthy Wave Mat product page, just scroll down to the “Specifications and Features” section, and about half way down that section you’ll find “Approximate Weight” and “Approximate Weight” for the infrared PEMF mat in question. (don’t worry that it says approximate, it should all be within 1/2 inch, or 1/2 lb of of those listed specifications).
Most the mats fold twice, so the listed length will be about 1/3 and will therefore fit in the luggage bag.
Let me know if this helps!
Thanks for leaving a comment! 🙂
Greg
I am interested in buying one of the above mat. But is still confuse which one should I go for. Please recommend.
What is the size of Healthy Wave mat and where is it made?
My recommended is the Healthy Wave Mat.
They’re a US based company and have actually quite a lot of different mat sizes.
Check out our review page on the Healthy Wave Mat to see all the different sizes next to each other.
If you mainly want a PEMF mat, then read our review page on the Healthy Wave Multi-Wave Mat, I explain in detail there its PEMF therapy and why I recommend it as the best PEMF mat.
Hope this helps!