Is High Intensity PEMF Dangerous?

High intensity PEMF therapy devices & PEMF machines are common in the PEMF world, but are they really safe?

Most brands will say that they are, if they sell those high intensity devices, and the brands that sell the low intensity devices say that the high intensity devices are dangerous.

So who’s right?

Is it possible that they are both correct?

We hazard to say that they are both correct, but only when certain configurations of the PEMF field are taken into consideration.

Read on to find out what officials are cautioning users of and what you need to take into consideration for yourself.

What is PEMF Intensity?

First a short review of what exactly is PEMF intensity, considering that’s what everyone is so concerned about, we should have an idea what it really is.


PEMF intensity is like the strength of a magnet.

PEMF is a pulsing magnetic field, and its intensity is the strength of that magnetic field which is pulsing back and forth.

PEMF, or magnetic intensity can be measured in a few different units of measurement, just like we can measure temperature in Fahrenheit and in Celsius, or distance in kilometres or miles.

We like to measure PEMF intensity in Gauss, but many others also like to use Tesla units which is just fine, it’s a simple conversion from Gauss to Tesla units or vice versa.

Intensity of the magnetic field can come in a vastly wide range, for instance, the natural Earth PEMFs of the Earth’s magnetic field which we live within can be anywhere from 0.3 Gauss to a maximum of 0.7 Gauss

By comparison those junkyard magnets which pick up entire cars to put in the crusher need 10,0000 Gauss of magnetic field strength to pick up a car.

Why Does PEMF Intensity Matter?

We may wonder, why does the intensity even matter, high or low, considering we as humans aren’t composed of metal, we’re biological beings, that means we don’t stick to magnets, after all we aren’t magnetic.

However to say that we aren’t affected by electromagnetic fields would be untrue, our bodies are actually using electrical impulses through neurons to control our every movement and function, from your heart beat, to lungs, to throwing a baseball; everything and every cell of your body requires electrical impulses to function.

The effects of PEMF on the body is quite noticeable in some circumstances, for instance this author has tried using a PEMF of very low intensity, 3 Gauss, at 25 Hz, and after 5 minutes I could feel my mind was sharper, wide awake and alert like it was operating on a higher frequency, way beyond what could be considered just a coincidence. (that was using a Healthy Wave Multi-Wave Mat)

Others have experienced their muscles involuntarily contracting when using an ultra high intensity device, some brands promote the level of intensity where your muscles contract involuntarily as the right intensity for you to use.

PEMF intensity matters because we know it makes a difference to our bodies, and if it makes a difference to our bodies, we need to be aware of what we’re subjecting our bodies to, especially when it is on an ongoing, daily or weekly basis.

For instance some high intensity PEMF devices go up to 10,000 Gauss, the strength of a junkyard car magnet, and whether others say it’s safe or not, personally this author for one would not subject his body to standing under a junkyard magnetic being turned on and off repeatedly everyday.

Low vs. High Intensity PEMF

Low intensity vs high intensity PEMF is something you may be trying to learn more about if you’re considering purchasing a PEMF mat, PEMF device or PEMF Machine for yourself.

Typically high intensity device brands like MagnaWave, PulseCenters or devices sold by Dr. Pawluk will use the same argument to refute the message from low intensity brands about high intensity being unsafe.

Usually this message consists of one example where the FDA has approved a high intensity device for doctor prescription (as a pharmaceutical replacement), and Dr. Pawluk’s opinion on the matter.

Dr. Pawluk also seems to refer to multiple PEMF studies in support of his high intensity argument, however he never mentions what intensity is used in those studies, or provides any reference to them so we can read them for ourselves.

After reading these articles explaining why high intensity is safe from Magnawave, PulseCenters, Dr. Pawluk & others, we found ourselves wanting more information after a lack of research references provided.

We started looking further into the matter, and what we found wasn’t surprising, though I would have thought that trustworthy authorities on PEMF would have already provided us this information.

Don’t worry, we’ve got it here for you.

High Intensity PEMF Safety Warning

The un-surprising, and perhaps rather obvious factor which seems to be the missing link in all the high intensity PEMF information is that whether an intensity is safe or not is primarily determined by its frequency.

In our modern world we’re surrounded by electronics & the EMFs they give off everyday, all day, in our homes and workplaces.

In recognition of this, an international body was founded in 1992, similar to the UN or other international groups, with the express purpose of providing consensus on the safe levels of exposure to electromagnetic fields.


This international body is the ICNIRP, the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection.

Non-ionizing refers to electromagnetic radiation/fields with frequencies too low to ionize atoms or molecules, (this means they don’t carry enough energy to heat up body tissues), everyday electronics and PEMF fall in to this category of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation. 

The ICNIRP has conducted extensive research and collaborated with scientists around the world to come up with the ICNIRP guidelines for low frequency EMFs like PEMF.

You can see their extensive research publication here, 


Of primary importance to us considering PEMF, is the chart which they present on page 12 of their research publication.

This chart shows us the safe reference levels for exposure to time varying electromagnetic fields, aka PEMF, and it shows this in the Tesla units, T.

Converting to our preferred Gauss units, we can see that the maximum safe range for the general public is between 0.01 and 0.1 Tesla, approximately 0.055 Tesla or 550 Gauss at a maximum of 1 Hz frequency.

pemf intensity safety range
ICNIRP Guidelines Chart with Gauss Indicated

We can see that this quickly drops off after 1 Hz, and picking a few points along the chart for reference we can see the max safe intensity levels at various frequencies as follows,

  • 0.055 Tesla = 550 Gauss at 1 Hz Frequency Max
  • 0.0065 Tesla = 65 Gauss at 5 Hz Frequency Max
  • 0.0007 Tesla = 7 Gauss at 10 Hz Frequency Max
  • 0.0003 Tesla = 3 Gauss at ~40 Hz Frequency to ~800 Hz

We’ve added the red & green lines & intensity points to make the chart easier to read, if you have questions on this please drop a comment on the page as we’d love to hear what you have to say!

The ICNIRP is communicating that the safe level of intensity depends on the frequency applied, which makes a lot of sense when you think about it, the total energy being applied is how intense it is multiplied by how many times it’s applied.

The ICNIRP is warning the public about unsafe electromagnetic field intensities above 550 Gauss at 1 Hz, and even lower intensity levels past 1 Hz.

Our concern is that almost all high intensity PEMF devices are above 550 Gauss at much higher frequencies than 1 Hz, and many are even up to a shocking (no pun intended) 10,000 Gauss, at higher frequencies than 1 Hz.

It does raise the question for us as to why none of the high intensity brands provide any of this information on their websites.

Research into High Intensity PEMF

Relative to the available research on low intensity PEMF, high intensity PEMF research studies are few and far between.

The high intensity articles we found when conducting our extensive PEMF literature review for our page, What is the Best PEMF Therapy, were primarily for its use as a cell apoptosis (cell destruction) modality.

We also tried to find the high intensity research articles referenced on Dr. Pawluks website but gave up after being unable to find them (if you find the articles he references, please share them with us!).

We were able to locate the following studies of high intensity PEMF, including the exception of one high intensity study from our PEMF research data table (found on our What is the Best PEMF Therapy page), which wasn’t regarding the use of high intensity PEMF for cancer cell destruction like the others.

Effect: High intensity PEMF reduced testosterone, prolactin, & estradiol in healthy male adults

Effect: Exposure to high intensity PEMF presented an increase in the number of cells with highly damaged DNA as compared with non-exposed cells

Effect: The only study reviewed using a higher intensity EMF of 200 Gauss did not show any effect on osteogenic differentiation & additionally it decreased MSC growth and metabolism

Effect: PEMF treatment increased & improved cardiac systolic function through inhibiting cardiac apoptosis (cardiac cellular death)

Research into Low Intensity PEMF

Finding low intensity PEMF research studies is far easier than high intensity studies, and as such we have a much longer list of studies.

It’s interesting to make note of the question as to why there are so many more studies of low intensity PEMF than there are of high intensity PEMF.

This could be because the scientific assumption is that lower intensity is safer, and we will yield better results than we would from high intensity.

Interestingly the frequency & intensity settings from the table above can be created by the adjustable PEMF device, the Healthy Wave Multi-Wave Mat

The above table is by no means a representation of ALL low intensity studies, these are simply ones which we found while reviewing PEMF literature for our page on the Best PEMF Therapy.

There are countless more studies on low intensity & more coming out every year.

High Intensity PEMF Devices

Aside from the high intensity PEMF devices being sold by Dr. Pawluk, PulseCenters, MagnaWave, and other PEMF brands, there are a few high intensity PEMF devices of note.

Reviewing these, we can keep in mind for comparison high intensity PEMF devices currently being marketed.


One of these devices is the Pap-IMI or Papimi, a high intensity device which has now been around for more than 20 years, created originally in Athens, Greece by Panos Pappas a Greek mathematician.

The Pap-IMI is now illegal, however continues to be used in practice and sold in the USA by those flying “under the radar” of the FDA.

Interesting to note that some high intensity PEMF brands such as PulseCenters still reference the Pap-IMI on their websites as an example of the great benefits of high intensity PEMF.

papimi pemf
Pap-IMI Machine

Pap-IMI or Papimi Specifications

  • Intensity: 500 Gauss & 1000 Gauss 
  • Frequency: 1 Hz to 8 Hz
  • Status: Illegal (deemed so by FDA)

Seattle Times – Public Never Warned about Dangerous Device


  •  “The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has linked Pappas’ machine to patient injuries and death
  • “the FDA in 2005 prohibited the use of the machine, The Seattle Times found PAP-IMIs in use in at least five states, including Washington”


  • We recommend reading the entire article from the Seattle Times, outlining the high intensity Pap-IMI device being linked to multiple deaths in the USA and how the device is still being used, flying “under the radar” of the FDA

Pap-IMI StudyEffect of Short-Duration, High Intensity Electromagnetic Pulses on Fresh Ulnar Fractures in Rats 


  • “This device is unique by virtue of the extremely high power output of each of the pulses it generates”
  • “the healing process was faster in rats that were not treated by PEMF”
  • “The results of this study do not support the claim that PEMF generated by the PAP-IMI stimulate osteogenesis and bone healing”


  • This is an interesting study of high intensity PEMF on bone healing, finding that healing was faster in rats who were not treated with the high intensity PEMF
  • Compare this to low intensity PEMF bone healing research which have shown positive results every time (in the studies we found, see studies on osteogenesis in the low intensity PEMF research table above)

Pap-Ion Magnetic Inductor – Wikipedia 


  • “It is illegal for use in the United States due to lack of Food and Drug Administration approval. Health Canada has issued a recommendation for the public to avoid use of these risky, unlicensed devices, and has ordered the Canada Border Services Agency to seize them upon attempted import into the country.”


The next high intensity device we will review is the FDA approved NeuroStar device, frequently referenced by high intensity PEMF brands as an example that high intensity PEMF is perfectly safe.

The NeuroStar is a device intended to treat drug resistant depression.

While the NeuroStar is FDA approved, we think it’s relevant to note a few facts about this approval which high intensity brands never mention.

neurostar pemf
NeuroStar Clinical Device
  • FDA approval limits NeuroStar treatment to 4-6 weeks total (we find this highly relevant, as when we’re choosing a PEMF device it’s for our long term health & use, not just 4-6 weeks)
  • NeuroStar treatment requires a prescription & is only provided to patients who did not improve after antidepressant medication
  • NeuroStar treatment can only be applied by a medical professional (not a device permitted to be used at home)
  • NeuroStar treatment uses a laser positioning system to target the application area (at home use high intensity devices have no such targeting ability)
  • High intensity PEMF devices can go up to 10,000 Gauss, which is twice the intensity of the highly regulated NeuroStar device

NeuroStar Specifications

  • Intensity: 5000 Gauss
  • Frequency: 10 Hz
  • Status: Legal (approved by FDA for prescription use only in patients who failed to receive improvements from antidepressant medication)

NeuroStar Homepage


  •  “NeuroStar TMS Therapy is indicated for the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in adult patients who have failed to receive satisfactory improvement from prior antidepressant medication in the current episode.”
  • “NeuroStar TMS Therapy is only available by prescription. A doctor can help decide if NeuroStar TMS Therapy is right for you.”
  • “The most common side effect is pain or discomfort at or near the treatment site”


  • Indicated right on the homepage of the NeuroStar device is that this is not a therapeutic device, it is used as a last resort prescription against severe depression

The NeuroStar TMS Device: Conducting the FDA Approved Protocol for Treatment of Depression 


  • “FDA approved NeuroStar depression treatment protocol (to be administered only under prescription and by a licensed medical profession in either an in- or outpatient setting)”
  • “Considering TMS as a potential therapeutic intervention for depression, it is important to recognize the FDA approved protocol is highly specified … FDA approval is limited to 10 Hz suprathreshold stimulation applied daily for 4-6 weeks using the NeuroStar”


  • Right from the FDA Approval protocol for the NeuroStar the number of treatment sessions are limited to 4-6 weeks, this restriction doesn’t give us confidence in the safety of long term use of high intensity PEMF devices 

NeuroStar Prescribing Information 


  • “Head Support System (includes laser positioning aid and coil positioning guide)”


  • No PEMF devices provide laser positioning to accurately apply the magnetic field, additionally we don’t have doctors prescribing the exact area for treatment. This raises concerns with us in the ability to accurately apply high intensity PEMF and not affect surrounding tissues

MRI Machines

The last high intensity device which we will briefly discuss are MRI machines.

MRI stands for magnetic resonance imaging, and these scans are widely used, however rarely, for diagnosis of the human body, and are arguably an incredible leap for the medical community. 

MRI scanner
MRI Scanner / CC BY

We felt these machines relevant to mention, because frequently high intensity PEMF brands will reference the safe use of MRI machines as a comparison to their high intensity PEMF devices.

MRI machines employ magnetic fields of incredible strength, 15,000 Gauss up to 30,000 Gauss to create their imaging.

There is a major difference between high intensity PEMF and MRI scans that no one seems to mention, but don’t worry, we’re here to inform you.

To help us with this, we go back to the ICNIRP, International Commission of Non-Ionizing Radiation.

MRI Machines use static magnetic fields, not pulsing fields like PEMF.

To compare the static magnetic fields of a rarely administered MRI scan to the repeated use of high intensity PEMF is really, quite frankly, completely absurd.

A static magnetic field is an un-moving magnetic field, a PEMF magnetic field is rapidly pulsing across the body.

There is a reason that the ICNIRP has guidelines for static magnetic fields (0 Hz) as well as for repeating magnetic fields which fall into the PEMF arena, and this is because they are entirely different phenomena.

You can read more on MRI machines and Static Magnetic Fields on the ICNIRP website, and find that they really are quite safe, especially when considering their rare use only in special cases for diagnosis. 

Which PEMF Intensity is Right for Me?

If you’ve made it this far down the page, thank you for taking the time to read as the compilation and analysis of all this information took days to find and put together.

Ultimately we aren’t here to tell you which PEMF device and intensity is the right one for you, but we’re striving to make PEMF research & information more transparent and readily available to help you with your own choices.

It really depends on the results that you’re looking for, whether its general health and well being, or to aid in recovery of a certain aliment in particular. 

If research supports a certain PEMF intensity and frequency as effective for your ailment in particular, as long as there are no contraindications of safety we would recommend looking for a device which supports or closely supports that intensity and frequency as an option.

Please do however with any device consider the safety implications.

As we discovered through researching for this article not all PEMF therapy configurations of intensity and frequency are safe for our bodies as we learned from the ICNIRP

We’re working on a PEMF Machine Buyer’s Guide which we hope will also help you in making your choices around PEMF devices, check it out!

We hope that you found this article highly informing and useful in your search for PEMF information, if you did, please share it with your friends and on social media so more people have a chance to find it!

Share on Facebook
Share on Pinterest
Share on Email
Share on Twitter

Have a Question?

Ask me in this comment section and I'll do my best to answer!

21 thoughts on “Is High Intensity PEMF Dangerous?”

    • Thanks Frederic, really appreciate hearing that.

      This particular page took a lot of time and research to create so I’m really happy you found it useful!

    • Hi Meredith,

      thanks for the comment and apologies about the very tardy reply.

      I can’t really advise you on what are the best PEMF configurations to rehab muscle and tendon injuries, however in the research project I did reviewing 335 PEMF studies it seemed determinate that lower frequency and lower intensity configurations consistently showed positive benefits.

      You can try searching our PEMF study database for studies which looked at muscle and tendon issues and see what frequencies and intensities they used to get an idea.

      Sorry I can’t be more helpful on specifics! 🙂


  1. Thank you for this comprehensive review. I have a cheaper device that generates 7500 gauss that I used a couple of times for my injuries. It seems to help but I was worried it could affect my heart badly, as I apply it to my left shoulder which is very close to the heart.

    That being said I have a comment and a question:
    One thing to add for the Neurostar device is that rTMS is usually 4 seconds on 26 seconds off for 37.5 minutes for one session. That means it only delivers the pulse for 300 seconds total in a session. That is a huge difference to what the high intensity PEMF devices do if you apply them for even 30 minutes everyday.

    And my question: I’m able to lower the intensity of my PEMF device to low intensities. (ie. 7 gauss) So for my current shoulder and knee injuries, would it create enough of an effect to use the coil on those areas for 30 minutes a day for a couple of weeks? Or would low intensity PEMF need a much longer application time and longer usage?

    Thank you

    • Hi Harun,

      thank you for the very detailed and very well educated comment.

      You’re correct.

      About the Neurostar you’re right, if very few pulses are delivered, this is much different than a constant application of high intensity PEMF over a longer duration.

      First I’ll make a general comment about the use of PEMF for 30 minutes a day, this is an anecdotal answer and based on sort of broad consensus around the use of PEMF therapy that yes I think 30 minutes a day at lower intensity is sufficient to get results.

      Just to clarify again, that’s not based on any consensus in research or anything, just broad scope consensus from various PEMF brands on what a minimum session duration usually is (most say 20 minutes).

      Now that said, if you can adjust the intensity, you can likely run it up to 100 gauss but maximum 1 Hz frequency setting: take a look at the ICNIRP safe magnetic field exposure chart, right on this page.

      This is the only real guide we have for what safe exposure is, and basically what is shows is that as you increase the frequency of the PEMF you need to reduce the intensity to stay under the “safe” line.

      If you have an adjustable device, I would just choose settings that keep you under that curve on the ICNIRP chart and find what setting you think you find the most benefit from.

      If you do find a couple settings you like best I’d be really interested to hear what they are.

      Sorry for the slow response on your comment… I really appreciate the depth of reading and understanding you have on this.

      Hopefully my comment helps just a little bit! 🙂


  2. Hello, I really appreciate seeing this information so clearly laid out, as well as such a thorough and well-thought out analysis. It’s hugely helpful, especially in differentiating between the low- and high-intensity claims. Thank you, also, for putting direct links to the research.

    Just one question, though – you conduct your research independently, right? That is, you are not associated with any particular PEMF device manufacturer?

  3. Hello, there! I really appreciate the diligence taken and thorough explanation in your analysis of this very confusing topic. Your writing is really clear and it’s very helpful. I also appreciate your including links to (some of ) the various research studies on these mats.

    Just one question – you conduct your analysis independently, yes? That is, you aren’t affiliated with any of the mat manufacturers?


    • Hi Jan,

      thanks for the comment(s). It does take a while to sift through all the PEMF research out there and try to make some sense of it, so I’m very happy you found this article helpful!

      We do also have a longer list of PEMF studies that I compiled together on our What is the best PEMF therapy page.

      Regarding your question, all of the analysis on our website is formed completely independently (primarily by myself); we are a separate website from any and all manufacturers and brands.

      We are however an affiliate website, as noted in the disclaimer at the bottom of most of our pages; that means we collect a commission for some of the products we link to from the website. The benefit however of being our own website is that I can present my unfiltered results to readers based on what I find reviewing the PEMF research. It also gives me the liberty to write objective reviews of products based on what I think of their devices, policies, pricing, guarantees, PEMF technology and so on.

      Hopefully this helps! 🙂

  4. I purchased a Healthy Wave Multi-Wave Pro mat for its ability to deliver 5 modes of therapy, perhaps the most important, the PEMF mode. I have late stage Lyme disease that has manifested in neurological issues. I am hoping you can guide me re the proper PEMF for treating Lyme symptoms. The Multi-Wave mat I have is capable of being programmed. I’d love to know the optimum PEMF range for neurological issues.
    Your thoroughness gives me hope you might be able to offer guidance.
    Many thanks for this rigorous presentation.

    • Hi Carl,

      thanks for your comment.

      Despite my rigorous presentation as you’ve put it, I’m not a doctor and as such I can’t and do not offer any medical guidance.

      I can only comment from my readings and research, and I advise you to consult your physician for any medical related questions.

      I’m sorry to hear of your condition and I hope that you may find some relief in the PEMF, there are at least a couple of testimonials on the Healthy Wave website regarding positive effects of PEMF with Lyme symptoms.

      I searched through the PubMed website and couldn’t find any studies specifically regarding Lyme disease.

      Because it is a neurological issue, there are a few studies which investigate nerve regeneration and PEMF.

      A couple of these I’ve actually listed on the Multi-Wave review page because they’re within the range of PEMF that can be generated by the Multi-Wave mat.

      This actually includes the NASA PEMF study, maybe one of the more well known PEMF studies, performed at 0.2 Gauss and 10Hz,

      Some other PEMF studies, seemingly all low intensity low frequency, with positive neurological effects,

      this study however showed that PEMF was ineffective with nerve regeneration, but a more rigorous and higher frequency approach was used,

      Perhaps this gives you a place to start, in a low frequency range.

      Really PEMF is still a new arena and there is so much research yet to be done on it, maybe your best bet is to start low frequency and try it for a week and see how you feel, then try another setting and so forth until you zero in on what helps the most.

      Sorry I can’t give you more of a specific direction but hopefully this helps give a little context and a place to start.

      To re-iterate do not take anything I’ve written here or on the website as medical advice, simply a (hopefully) helpful conversation.

      One last thing, you may have already seen this in your researching; anecdotally a rather well known podcaster named Tim Ferris apparently beat his Lyme disease symptoms permanently after a 7 day fast while only allowing water (I read this in one of his books). Again consult your physician before taking any avenue or direction, but I thought to mention it in case you’re interested in checking it out. You should be able to hear more on some of his podcast episodes like this one,

      Hope this rather late comment back finds you well, let me know if you have any other questions I may be able to help with.


  5. Thank you for this research. I purchased a HealthyLine Platinum mat and was getting ready to return it for a mat Dr. Pawluck sells. I saw this article just in time. I cannot find an independent study on HealthyLine mats.

    • Hi Alason,

      I’m glad my article helped!

      I think independent studies of a lot of PEMF products are tough to come by, that’s why I compiled the PEMF research studies I did from the Pubmed website to try and get a better unbiased perspective on what information is out there currently about PEMF therapy.


  6. Pawluk and others make one strong argument for high intensities which you haven’t addressed. That is that most studies are done in-vitro with the magnetic field placed very close to the cells. But in our bodies the field is inches away from the cells. It is a fact that magnetic fields fall off quickly with distance. (Generally 1/distance squared, or 1/distance cubed.) So isn’t it true that in order to achieve, for example, a 1 gauss field inside your body, you would need to start with a 10-100 gauss field?

    • Hi Sue,

      this is in fact true, thank you for the intelligent comment.

      The only way to tell for sure would be to use a meter to determine the strength of the applied PEMF field at the anticipated application location (ie. 5 inches away etc).

      Personally I am concerned with too high intensity at too high a frequency being applied so before using any kind of a high power device, I would check this, and ensure that the configuration is under the “safe range” on the ICNIRP exposure chart which I show on this page.

      When Dr. Pawluk made the reference to the safety of an MRI machine using 15 to 30,000 Gauss and that being safe for humans which we know, he didn’t mention the glaring difference being the MRI using a static magnetic field, dramatically different than a pulsing field which is actually able to deliver energy.

      To each their own, I just try and share what I’ve learned on my website here.

      To me, PEMF therapy is still a very new technology and based on the research I’ve reviewed, there isn’t much consensus around the best way to utilize it or any guidelines either and that’s why I prefer personally to take an overly cautious approach and when people ask my opinion I make similarly overly cautious suggestions.

      But you are very correct in your comment! 🙂

      Thanks again,


  7. Excellent. Very credible and informative analysis. I haven’t found any other author or website provide such direct connection of intensity and frequency in relation to the safety as this article. Incredible job. Thank you

    • Glad to hear you liked it Dilip, I hadn’t seen anyone else out there point these things out about PEMF intensity and frequency either. Stay tuned though I have more articles coming 🙂

  8. Thank you for this article! I have/had been considering the EarthPulse as it is the PEMF machine that clearly seems to focus on sleep and I could use it throughout the night for brain entrainment to promote deep sleep. However, given your thoughts above and the online feedback that the company itself is not reliable, I have been looking for another option.

    Do you have a recommendation on a device that will encourage entry into deep sleep?

    • Hey Melissa,

      thanks for the comment!

      It really does help motivate that wow, people are actually getting something out of the work and research I put in to making these articles, so thank you!

      I know that there are various meditation methods and apps out there that are supposed to help with sleep, also even the nature type sound tracks like waves on the beach or rainfall that can help with sleep.

      If you’re looking specifically for a PEMF device to help with sleep I would recommend like I do on the website, any of the Healthy Wave PEMF mat devices.

      That’s because number one, they’re at a safe and low intensity, and two, you can adjust the frequency right down to the sleep range wavelengths.

      Usually for example when I use my Healthy Wave mat before bed, instead of running it at 8 Hz, I’ll use it at 4 Hz, to calm and slow the mind down to get ready for sleep.

      I find also that the infrared heat of the Healthy Wave mat can make you incredibly sleepy, it’s just important not to fall asleep with the temperature set too high because you’ll wake up pretty dehydrated.

      So that is one draw back I suppose for the Healthy Wave mat using it for sleep, because I would use it before bed, but not to actually sleep on all night, because the amethyst crystals aren’t as soft as your bed is for example.

      My routine is, infrared heat on at around 125F, and PEMF on at 4Hz, and then I do my stretching and relaxing or TV watching while on the mat, and then I switch it off and drag myself over to bed to fall asleep.

      Hope my comment may help a little, let me know if you have any other questions!

  9. Thank you, l have searched for intelligent analysis and even bought Dr.Paulsyns book, which just confused me more.
    Your article is the first understandable article l have found.
    Many thanks,


Leave a Comment

See our Best Rated PEMF Mat!

Check out our review on the Healthy Wave Multi-Wave Mat to see why we say it’s the Best PEMF Mat!

And find out how you can use the Multi-Wave mat to almost exactly replicate the Nasa PEMF waveform!