Disclaimer: this research study’s copyright belongs to the authors and PubMed and not HealthMatReview.com, further details below.
Our Summary
Previous studies showed the effects of PEMF on bone regeneration. This study now aims to investigate if the efficacy can be improved by repetitive exposure to PEMF as well as its effect on osteoclasts. Results should that treatment by gradually increasing frequency showed the best efficacy and that 26 Hz frequency improved bone formation while 16 Hz frequency improved bone remodeling.
Pubmed Study Link
PDF Study Link
Study Categories
Authors
[‘Sabrina Ehnert’, ‘Martijn van Griensven’, ‘Marina Unger’, ‘Hanna Scheffler’, ‘Karsten Falldorf’, ‘Anne-Kristin Fentz’, ‘Claudine Seeliger’, ‘Steffen Schröter’, ‘Andreas K. Nussler’, ‘Elizabeth R. Balmayor’]
PMID
29584629
PMCID
PMC5979428
Published Date
more study details
Frequency (Hz)
Frequency Range
Intensity (G)
Intensity Range
Waveform
PEMF/EMF/RF/LT
Study Subject Types
Keywords Listed
extremely low frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields (ELF-PEMF), primary human osteoblasts (OBs), primary human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (Ad-MSCs), primary human osteoclasts (OCs)
Added Descriptive Keywords
bone, regeneration, bone marrow, bone remodeling, bone formation, human
Disclaimer
All intellectual property and copyright of this research study sourced from PubMed, is the property of the authors and associates and is not the property of HealthMatReview.com. This research study has been included in our custom PEMF research database for the educational purposes of our readers. The on page summary, added descriptive keywords and other study details are copyright of HealthMatReview.com and were added to improve the search function of this custom research database.
Comments are moderated. Tick “Email me when my question is replied to” to get notified.