Disclaimer: this research study’s copyright belongs to the authors and PubMed and not HealthMatReview.com, further details below.
Our Summary
Sixty seven percent of people experience non-specific neck pain at some point in life with ten percent becoming chronic. The purposed of this review is to investigate the efficacy and safety of different treatments to neck pain and acute whiplash injury. Finding show that PEMF is more effective in pain reduction and passive motion pain than sham PEMF treatment with no recorded harmful effects.
Pubmed Study Link
PDF Study Link
Study Categories
Authors
[‘Allan I Binder’]
PMID
19445809
PMCID
PMC2907992
Published Date
more study details
Frequency (Hz)
Frequency Range
Intensity (G)
Intensity Range
Waveform
PEMF/EMF/RF/LT
Study Subject Types
Keywords Listed
Added Descriptive Keywords
neck pain, chronic, muscle, posture, injury, acute whiplash injury, pain, human
Disclaimer
All intellectual property and copyright of this research study sourced from PubMed, is the property of the authors and associates and is not the property of HealthMatReview.com. This research study has been included in our custom PEMF research database for the educational purposes of our readers. The on page summary, added descriptive keywords and other study details are copyright of HealthMatReview.com and were added to improve the search function of this custom research database.
Comments are moderated. Tick “Email me when my question is replied to” to get notified.