Disclaimer: this research study’s copyright belongs to the authors and PubMed and not HealthMatReview.com, further details below.
Our Summary
The rationale of this study is to compare the effects PEMF and electric stimulation therapies on a burn injuries. There are 21 rats used in this experiment that were divided into 3 groups comprising of a control group, PEMF group and electric stimulation for 14 days. All groups were also treated with antibacterial pomade. Results were evident that both therapies had positive healing effects on burn injuries with PEMF producing more significant healing effects compared to electric stimulation.
Pubmed Study Link
PDF Study Link
Study Categories
Authors
[‘Yaşar Keskin’, ‘Nurettin Taştekin’, ‘Mehmet Kanter’, ‘Hüsamettin Top’, ‘Ferda Özdemir’, ‘Mustafa Erboğa’, ‘Özgür Taşpınar’, ‘Necdet Süt’]
PMID
31893272
PMCID
PMC6935725
Published Date
more study details
Frequency (Hz)
Frequency Range
Intensity (G)
Intensity Range
Waveform
PEMF/EMF/RF/LT
Study Subject Types
Keywords Listed
Burn healing, electrical stimulation, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy
Added Descriptive Keywords
burns, fire, skin, burn victim, injury, rat
Disclaimer
All intellectual property and copyright of this research study sourced from PubMed, is the property of the authors and associates and is not the property of HealthMatReview.com. This research study has been included in our custom PEMF research database for the educational purposes of our readers. The on page summary, added descriptive keywords and other study details are copyright of HealthMatReview.com and were added to improve the search function of this custom research database.
Comments are moderated. Tick “Email me when my question is replied to” to get notified.